Author Topic: Possibly the most ridiculous patent case yet...  (Read 2771 times)

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,244
    • OW
Possibly the most ridiculous patent case yet...
« on: Thursday, July 02, 2009, 03:17:47 AM »
http://kotaku.com/5305851/microsoft-sued-over-xbox-live

Quote
In 1994, Peter Hochstein and Jeffrey Tenenbaum patented a method for "communicating live while playing the same video game in separate locations". In 2004, they sued Microsoft, accusing Xbox Live of infringing on that patent.

Offline Quemaqua

  • 古い塩
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 16,498
  • パンダは触るな。
    • Bookruptcy
Re: Possibly the most ridiculous patent case yet...
« Reply #1 on: Thursday, July 02, 2009, 06:03:41 AM »
It's enough to make you want to find people's addresses so you can stab them in their sleep.

I'm going to patent the process of suing people over patents and say I invented it, then we'll put an end to this bullshit.

天才的な閃きと平均以下のテクニックやな。 課長有野

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,244
    • OW
Re: Possibly the most ridiculous patent case yet...
« Reply #2 on: Thursday, July 02, 2009, 12:01:17 PM »
I don't understand one thing. Can you just patent any idea or must you show some work towards that idea first?

Offline idolminds

  • ZOMG!
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 11,940
Re: Possibly the most ridiculous patent case yet...
« Reply #3 on: Thursday, July 02, 2009, 12:12:59 PM »
You used to need a working model, but now you can patent ideas with no work to show for it (and no plan to ever work for it, you can just sue anyone that uses "your" idea.)

Offline WindAndConfusion

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,336
Re: Possibly the most ridiculous patent case yet...
« Reply #4 on: Thursday, July 02, 2009, 04:26:31 PM »
^^^ Actually, in the US, you never even needed a working implementation. All you need is a description sufficient so that someone "skilled in the arts" could replicate it.

With that in mind, you probably won't be surprised if I tell you that many people in the US have owned patents on perpetual motion machines.