It probably started out very routinely, but those 4 pawns facing each other in the center without solid protection is not a good thing.
Yea the knights are supposed to be out simultaneously in support. To be honest, we played each other six times in a row and after the exact same moves, we got bored.
Normally if I am white, I'll move out my king's pawn first two steps. Then Ghandi will do the exact same to prevent me from going further. Then I'll bring out my knight to attack the pawn blocking mine, which will force Ghandi to do bring out his knight to protect his pawn. Next I'll move my queen's knight two spaces ahead, and so on.
I think here we both decided to do a touch bit differently.
I moved my king's pawn ahead two spaces, after which he did as well. Instead of attacking it with a knight, or bringing out the other knight in a supporting role, I just went ahead and moved my queen's pawn two spaces.
This wasn't a good idea on my part, but I was just trying to do something different.
It wasn't a good idea, because while my queen's pawn was under protection, it was under the protection of an extremely heavy weight.
Ghandi's correct move would have been to take my queen's pawn with his long pawn out there.
Had he done so, I would have been forced to take it with my queen. All he would have had to done at that stage is bring out his knight to attack my queen's position and force her back to where she came from. Basically that would have meant that I had a move wasted, while his move was spent developing his knight forward.