I have to agree with you on the buggy thing, but NWN2 looks really pretty at a decent resolution.
And if you can get a lot of the details turned on, w/out sacrificing and in-game performance.
Sure it doesn't look as good as the resources it hogs, but it does look very good.
Agreed.
I think NWN 2 is pretty, if you can get a majority of the detailed turned on.
But it doesn't look *that* good for it to run like it does on my system -- it's just all over the place.
I figured before both NWN 2 and Oblivion came out, I'd be complaining about the performance of Oblivion, not NWN 2. Yeah, guess again....
Looks aren't everything, but they do matter. Call me superficial, but graphics count for quite a bit to me. Stability is of course important, just like performance.. It's all about balance.
Graphics are important to me, as well. As long as the game looks "just okay", I'd be happy -- as long as the game performance is very stable. It doesn't have to be the best looking thing, technically, for me, if you decide to give me a very stable running game. See Deus Ex, as my example -- the game looked good, not great; but it ran very stable, so the framerate was never dropping. Too bad they didn't do that w/ DX: IW.
I think the game performance is more important than the graphics. If you're going to trump the graphics out, but the game runs like a slide-show quite often, what good is that??? Blah. At least if you can turn the graphics quality down a bit and it runs better, you're all set -- that's fine. Though, you're really screwed if you turn it down and it runs as good as it did all trumped out on "high."
Though, if a dev can make the game look outstanding and the game performance is outstanding, that's of course, great!!!! Can't get much better than that.