That's correct shock, but I still don't understand why they didn't shut down the campus. The fact that they didn't the shooter or a gun should have alerted them that he was still on the loose.
It's still early on, though, and I'm sure that we will learn more later on.
I'm starting to get pissed off about these kinds of remarks I'm hearing out of individuals and the media. What about it happening on a college campus translates it into it being treated as a terrorist attack? There are probaby hundreds of shootings across the U.S.
every day where the shooter is at large hours after the shooting. Do they shut down cities or towns? No.
In fact I find it downright offensive to the victims of such shootings that they are so easily cast under the rug while people are expressing outrage nationwide that there wasn't a lockdown when the exact same thing happens, except it's on a college campus.
Someone got shot and killed on the street in front of one of my college's buildings and there was no outrage expressed when the campus wasn't shut down. Why not? Because there was no reason to. Just because someone got shot doesn't mean the shooter (who was never caught by the way) was going to go around wasting people.
The media is taking advantage of the situation and blowing it way out of proportion and unfairly grilling the administration and police. I mean of course there is going to be hindsight in a case like this, but damn, put yourselves in the shoes of the administration after the first shooting. Was there any sign at all that this guy was going to do this? It's not like he was busting down doors in the dorm and shooting in there. He went into one room and that was it.
And shit like what Matt Lauer said is just retarded. He said he was surprised how close he could get to the dorm where the first shooting took place and that if he had a swipe card he could have gotten in. Hello you fucking idiot, a ton of other peoples' homes are in there. What do you expect?