But the Durham University-led research found that while men can judge whether a woman is footloose-and-fancy-free or not, there is no common facial detail to explain it.
Might have something to do with the short skirt, the protruding cleavage, and the open bottle of Jeager on the counter in front of them.
Women were usually interested in men who appeared to be more likely to want a long-term relationship.
Yeah, I'm sorry, but every chick I know that's interested in a long-term relationship pretty much constantly makes the wrong decision about guys and ends up in the sack with some asshole. Maybe it's different wherever they did this study, but I think they might want to check some other statistics, and possibly the accuracy of these people's deductions.
Dr Lynda Boothroyd, from Durham University's Psychology Department, said: "This shows that these initial impressions may be part of how we assess potential mates -- or potential rivals -- when we first meet them.
Wow, you mean first impressions are important? Who knew? I wonder how much grant money they gave her to come up with that little nugget of brilliance.
"These will then give way over time to more in-depth knowledge of that person as you get to know them better, and may change with age."
Shock and awe.
"Lots of previous studies have shown that people can judge a lot about a person from their face..."
Beware tumors and neck lesions, but hot red lipstick and tongue rings equal go time (as long as they have a certificate from the local clinic to ensure they're still disease-free, of course).
EDIT - Haha, 2 replies before I could even post my haphazard mockeries. We're on the ball tonight.