Author Topic: Cloverfield  (Read 6366 times)

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,602
    • Facebook Me
Cloverfield
« on: Monday, May 19, 2008, 09:09:12 AM »
Saw Cloverfield last night.  I didn't know what to expect really, as I don't know anyone that's seen it but I was pretty excited for it.  It seemed very mysterious, which intrigued me quite a bit.

Well, it blew my expectations out of the water.  It's filmed from a handycam a la The Blair Witch Project.  Unlike The Blair Witch Project it's actually a pretty good movie.  Also, it's a pretty clean video, not like what you get in TBWP.  The perspective really makes it pretty visceral and makes you feel like a part of the experience.  I was pretty tense the entire time.  I haven't been like that during a scary movie for a really long time.  Usually I laugh at them.

I'd give it a 4 of 5 stars on the Netflix scale.

Offline idolminds

  • ZOMG!
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 11,939
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #1 on: Monday, May 19, 2008, 09:37:31 AM »
I agree, it was pretty awesome. The only thing holding it back for me was the typical "heroes make stupid decisions" that are in every scary movie.
(click to show/hide)

Other than a couple of things like that, I liked it.

Offline JacksRag(e)

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 468
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #2 on: Monday, May 19, 2008, 09:38:07 AM »
Yeah, it was one of my more favourite movies at the video store.  Unfortunately, most of the people I know who've seen it hated it and tell everyone around them that it was the worst movie they've ever seen only cause it didn't fit what they were expecting.  They say there's no monster, you can't even see it and that it's slow and boring.  Fortunately, they're morons and their opinions are irrelevant.

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,602
    • Facebook Me
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #3 on: Monday, May 19, 2008, 10:39:10 AM »
The only thing holding it back for me was the typical "heroes make stupid decisions" that are in every scary movie.
(click to show/hide)
To be fair, it was pretty clear that most of the characters knew the decisions were stupid.

(click to show/hide)

One of the things I really found interesting about the movie was the beginning.

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)

Very well done.

Offline iPPi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,159
  • Roar!
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #4 on: Monday, May 19, 2008, 11:13:58 AM »
I enjoyed it as well... though I felt a little bit of motion sickness near the end of the film.  Still, it was a pretty good movie.

Offline Cobra951

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8,934
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #5 on: Monday, May 19, 2008, 05:14:21 PM »
I hate shaky-cam.  I think it's a fad, and hope it will pass.  Having said that, now I'm curious, and I want to see this.

Offline Quemaqua

  • 古い塩
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 16,498
  • パンダは触るな。
    • Bookruptcy
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #6 on: Monday, May 19, 2008, 07:16:21 PM »
Funny, I thought it looked super-ultra-lame.  It seemed interesting at first, but the more I saw of ads and stuff the more it looked just awful to me.  Julia saw it and she thought it was decent, but nothing to write home about.  I guess this is just another instance of ads killing something for me when they're supposed to sell me on it.

天才的な閃きと平均以下のテクニックやな。 課長有野

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,602
    • Facebook Me
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #7 on: Monday, May 19, 2008, 07:20:30 PM »
Well, you should watch it anyway.

Offline idolminds

  • ZOMG!
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 11,939
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday, May 20, 2008, 06:53:18 PM »
I hate shaky-cam.  I think it's a fad, and hope it will pass.  Having said that, now I'm curious, and I want to see this.
Shaky-cam actually sells the idea here. Its supposed to be a tape found after this incident, so its supposed to looks like it was all shot handheld by some dude.

Now, shaky-cam in regular movies? Yeah, hope that kind of thing goes away. Shaky just for the sake of it sucks.

Offline Ghandi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4,804
  • HAMS
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday, May 21, 2008, 11:07:23 AM »
So the entire thing is shaky-cam? There's no way that I could sit through that. I'd rather tear out my fingernails.

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,602
    • Facebook Me
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday, May 21, 2008, 12:07:31 PM »
Yes, 100% of the movie is from the perspective of a single videocamera carried by a few individuals.

Offline JacksRag(e)

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 468
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #11 on: Thursday, May 22, 2008, 01:05:27 PM »
Usually, I'm not a big fan of the shaky-cam thing, but in this case it adds to the movie, I think.  It's really not as bad as you might think, the camera is mostly very steady, I thought, with the shaking mostly occurring when they're running.  It restricts what you can see and makes things a bit more tense.  I think it worked a bit better because of the cam style.

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,602
    • Facebook Me
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #12 on: Thursday, May 22, 2008, 01:44:36 PM »
I wholeheartedly agree.  Without the cam perspective, this movie would have not nearly been as good.  Like Godzilla 2000 or something.

Don't let the perspective turn you away.  I suggest giving it a chance.

Offline Cobra951

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8,934
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #13 on: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 06:24:49 PM »
Shaky-cam actually sells the idea here. Its supposed to be a tape found after this incident, so its supposed to looks like it was all shot handheld by some dude.

Now, shaky-cam in regular movies? Yeah, hope that kind of thing goes away. Shaky just for the sake of it sucks.

For once, I agree.  I finally saw this.  It's very effective.  It really drew me in.  When I started getting queasy, I focused on the right speaker and watched the action with peripheral vision.  That didn't happen very often, mostly when things first got hot and heavy out in the street.  After that, I guess I got used to it.

They did a hell of a job in maintaining the illusion of a happenstance amateur video recording of all the events.  It's what elevated the film above the typical creature feature.  Half the time it almost felt like it was happening to me.

I have to agree with you about the stupid-decisions thing too.  But at least everyone made their own individual choice which way to go.

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,602
    • Facebook Me
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #14 on: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 06:41:11 PM »
It's funny that you resurrected this thread.  I just re-watched this last week.  It started out from that MKV thread, I just got in a video-encoder mood and decided to check out how Cloverfield turned out in H.264.  At first I was going to just see how the video looked full-screen, but I ended up watching the entire movie.

Offline Cobra951

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8,934
Re: Cloverfield
« Reply #15 on: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 07:25:57 PM »
That *is* funny.  I'm 10 months out of date here.  Weird how things work out.  Recently I emailed a friend I hadn't talked to in years.  The very next day my brother called me from Dayton.  He was covering a regional HS basketball game between St X and Fairmont, and he wanted to tell me that my friend's brother was coaching Fairmont!  I haven't seen him in 15 years.