This seems apropos. I'm on the fence on whether to pick up the 360 XBL version for $8. That price tag goes back up to normal in a couple of days (somewhere around $20, I guess). After sinking so much time into Inquisition, I'm now more curious than ever about the one DA installment I'm missing. The reviews have mixed things to say, but they are generally positive. I remember not liking the demo, 4 years back. But the videos I'm watching go far beyond that limited corridor run through an empty landscape. Hmm.
And then there's Varric again. Can't get enough Varric. Oh, and the story of Hawke, which affects Inquisition rather prominently. Yes, maybe I'll bite.
Edit: My original comments on the demo. At the time, I hadn't played any Dragon Age at all. It was all the DA talk here that made me jump into DA:O. I had forgotten that.
Keep in mind - I ran DA2 on the PC. And keep in mind - it's also been much cheaper on the PC. Hell, it was even in a Origin Humble Bundle BTA Tier w/ a bunch of other EA games.
I would say it's worth $8 on the 360, if you can look past the laundry list of flaws. And that's a big "if", for many.
The problem is - can you get past the laundry list of flaws? That's the problem for most people w/ DA2.
Just...don't expect DA2 to be as great as DAO or DAI.
At their default settings (i.e. Normal) - DA2 is nowhere as strategic as DAO; nor it it even as strategic as DAI (from what I've played so far of DAI). In terms of strategic-style of combat, it looks like so far that DA2 < DAI < DAO. DA2 feels way more action-y. DA2 also has less customization for your characters' equipment in the Inventory, when compared to both DAI + DAO; some things are only upgradable + can't be swapped-out even. One of my biggest problems w/ DA2 is the huge recycling of areas (which are often duplicated or barely changed) + revisiting of locations for quests (even for both side + main) . Seriously, this game does this recycling thing to a very ridiculous amount. And there lies the laundry list of problems many had w/ DA2.
DA2 mostly takes place in Kirkwall...and a few places + locations surrounding it. The story is not of an epic scale of DAO or DAI (i.e. the world around you is being invaded by evil, go gather some companions to go destroy it) - but is much more personal here in DA2 (i.e. Hawke + his family go through lots of problems over the years, especially when immigrating to Kirkwall + then actually getting there). Also, since this all occurs over a certain amount of years + time, each Act feels like it has it own story + Arc to it. Each Act's main quest feels, in a sense, like its own "short story" in a time in Hawke's life - which I thought was pretty cool and different for a RPG to try to tackle. Others have hated the lack of epic scope in the story, since it feels like 3 different stories here for Hawke.
I really loved the character development, writing, dialogue, and voice-acting - as I normally do w/ most BioWare games. So, it's probably worth playing for that stuff alone, as long as you can tolerate the laundry list of flaws.
And that's what makes the game so divisive - with the laundry list of problems, either one of those or a combo of those things can be enough for some gamers to just ditch the game + not finish it.
If I ever got a job at BioWare and was given the task of overhauling + remastering Dragon Age 2 (which I do think is something they should do, since I think it could've been great if it had tons of more time in development), I'd really love to tackle + overhaul the hell out of that flawed-gem.