« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Playboy must be in trouble.  (Read 4376 times)

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Playboy must be in trouble.
« on: Friday, October 09, 2009, 02:15:09 PM »
Because they do seem desperate for ideas:

http://stars.ign.com/articles/103/1033645p1.html
Logged

Offline idolminds

  • ZOMG!
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 11,943
Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
« Reply #1 on: Friday, October 09, 2009, 03:03:02 PM »
For fucks sake, this isn't difficult. Woman - clothes + camera = NEW ISSUE!
Logged

Offline Xessive

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9,920
    • XSV @ deviantART
Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
« Reply #2 on: Friday, October 09, 2009, 07:00:57 PM »
Wow, that sounds pretty desperate.

Why Marge?! Why not Jessica Rabbit?
Logged

Offline Quemaqua

  • 古い塩
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 16,498
  • パンダは触るな。
    • Bookruptcy
Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
« Reply #3 on: Friday, October 09, 2009, 08:40:20 PM »
That's pretty effing weird.
Logged

天才的な閃きと平均以下のテクニックやな。　課長有野

Offline Ghandi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4,804
  • HAMS
Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
« Reply #4 on: Friday, October 09, 2009, 08:47:38 PM »
WTF
Logged

Offline gpw11

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7,182
Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
« Reply #5 on: Saturday, October 10, 2009, 08:37:39 PM »
Wasn't Rupaul in Playboy as well?
Logged

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
« Reply #6 on: Saturday, October 10, 2009, 08:38:40 PM »
Ron Paul?
Logged

Offline gpw11

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7,182
Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
« Reply #7 on: Saturday, October 10, 2009, 08:58:51 PM »
No, Rupaul the shemale.
Logged

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
« Reply #8 on: Saturday, October 10, 2009, 09:07:26 PM »



 :o
Logged

Offline gpw11

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7,182
Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
« Reply #9 on: Saturday, October 10, 2009, 10:39:51 PM »
Yeah, I don't know if it ever happened.  I remember it being a big deal a few years ago.
Logged

Offline MysterD

  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 18,050
  • OWNet 4 Eternity & Beyond
Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
« Reply #10 on: Sunday, October 11, 2009, 12:38:50 PM »
Quote from: Pugnate on Saturday, October 10, 2009, 08:38:40 PM
Ron Paul?

LOL @ The Bruno joke here (of Bruno getting RuPaul and Ron Paul mixed up).

Good one.
Logged

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
« Reply #11 on: Sunday, October 11, 2009, 12:55:57 PM »
Have not seen Bruno yet.
Logged

Offline Xessive

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9,920
    • XSV @ deviantART
Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
« Reply #12 on: Sunday, October 11, 2009, 02:29:57 PM »
Quote from: Pugnate on Sunday, October 11, 2009, 12:55:57 PM
Have not seen Bruno yet.
Don't. It was a collossal waste of time and it had too many penises on screen.
Logged

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
« Reply #13 on: Sunday, October 11, 2009, 10:10:19 PM »
You mean anything more than zero?
Logged

Offline Xessive

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9,920
    • XSV @ deviantART
Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
« Reply #14 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 09:46:01 AM »
Quote from: Pugnate on Sunday, October 11, 2009, 10:10:19 PM
You mean anything more than zero?
Precisely.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »