Author Topic: Serious Hams  (Read 4712 times)

Offline Ghandi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4,804
  • HAMS
Serious Hams
« on: Wednesday, December 09, 2009, 10:37:18 PM »
Version 2.0.

It was only a matter of time. Lets do this thing.

Edit: SeriousHams.com purchased.

Edit2: host purchased.
« Last Edit: Wednesday, December 09, 2009, 11:28:33 PM by Ghandi »

Offline Quemaqua

  • 古い塩
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 16,498
  • パンダは触るな。
    • Bookruptcy
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #1 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 12:18:06 AM »
No wai!

天才的な閃きと平均以下のテクニックやな。 課長有野

Offline Ghandi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4,804
  • HAMS
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #2 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 01:30:11 AM »
« Last Edit: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 02:16:56 AM by Ghandi »

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,604
    • Facebook Me
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #3 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 05:56:45 AM »
I'm actually surprised that domain was available.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,244
    • OW
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #4 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 06:10:13 AM »
haha Ghandhi.

Well done!

Offline PyroMenace

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,930
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #5 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 06:24:05 AM »
Please explain this to me, google search and wiki turned up nothing.

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,604
    • Facebook Me
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #6 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 06:30:08 AM »
Please explain this to me, google search and wiki turned up nothing.
Were you not part of the Gamers.com shenanigans after the IGN exodus?  Can you guys believe that was like 2001?  Crazy.

Offline PyroMenace

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,930
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #7 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 06:52:03 AM »
Yea I was at gamers.com, and I do vaguely remember serious hams, but I never went there. Is like thong thursdays or something?

Offline Schlotzky5

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 254
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #8 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 08:13:02 AM »
Sadly, this time we know more about copyright laws and we can't just make a site with rando pics on it.


We'll think of something.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,244
    • OW
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #9 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 10:11:58 AM »
As long as Gandhi doesn't start posing himself...

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,604
    • Facebook Me
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #10 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 10:49:55 AM »
No ninja icon on that post, Pug?  That was a surefire candidate if I ever saw one.

Offline Ghandi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4,804
  • HAMS
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #11 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 01:49:08 PM »
I'm actually surprised that domain was available.

Yeah I was too. You'd think that someone would have snatched up the most awesome domain name in existence by now.

I actually have no clue what I'm going to do with the site. I need to figure out some way to profit off of it.

Offline Schlotzky5

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 254
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #12 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 03:11:10 PM »
we could run a site that set up very elaborate pranks at a fee.

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,604
    • Facebook Me
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #13 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 03:37:35 PM »
Make it one of those crappy fake blog sites that just put random ads on it.  I've heard those actually do quite well.

Offline Schlotzky5

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 254
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #14 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 05:12:38 PM »
you mean msn.com?

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,244
    • OW
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #15 on: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 11:45:57 PM »
haha I know what you mean Schlotzky... Their whole new "Bing" push is extremely stupid and poorly disguised.

Offline Ghandi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4,804
  • HAMS
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #16 on: Friday, December 11, 2009, 02:46:31 PM »
113 hits so far. The majority of whom were undoubtedly disappointed.

Also, fuck Google Apps.

Offline idolminds

  • ZOMG!
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 11,940
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #17 on: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 11:09:01 AM »
Dude, your site says "Account Suspended".

Offline Ghandi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4,804
  • HAMS
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #18 on: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 11:56:46 AM »
Yeah, I need to renew it. I haven't done anything on it in ages and I only spent a matter of hours on the site total. But I just got a book on working with Dreamweaver that I'm slowly getting through, so I should make some progress soon.

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,604
    • Facebook Me
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #19 on: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 02:19:59 PM »
A book on Dreamweaver?  Shouldn't you get a book on XHTML and CSS to start, then move on to learning the nuances of Dreamweaver?  As far as I know, most people that use Dreamweaver don't use the WYSIWYG feature and do all the code manually.

Offline Ghandi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4,804
  • HAMS
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #20 on: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 03:02:08 PM »
It goes over XHTML and CSS as well. I guess I just figured that, if I want to learn a program, I mine as well use the best.

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,604
    • Facebook Me
Re: Serious Hams
« Reply #21 on: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 04:06:43 PM »
Oh, I wasn't doubting your choice of program.  Dreamweaver is the best, by far.  I use it when I do any coding or editing, but I just use the code view.  I just like Dreamweaver because it colors the tags, seamlessly ties into your web host, and has a nice error and code compliance feature.  But you still have to know XHTML and CSS.

Edit:  Sorry, one of my acronyms was screwy.
« Last Edit: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 05:06:01 PM by scottws »