Author Topic: Dear MysterD  (Read 10554 times)

Offline PyroMenace

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,930
Dear MysterD
« on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 07:28:07 PM »
Buy a console plz. kthx

-Pyro

Offline MysterD

  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 18,049
  • OWNet 4 Eternity & Beyond
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #1 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 07:33:50 PM »
Elaborate why.

EDIT:
Or better yet, just buy me a PS3 or X360 console, thanx.
Or hell - buy me both.

Offline PyroMenace

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,930
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #2 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 07:52:20 PM »
I'm just curious as you why you haven't bought one yet. You post news on all the games that aren't coming to PC and console games that have been ported badly to PC. Plus both consoles have been discounted with more hard drive space with the PS3 Slim and the Xbox 360 Elite. Not to mention your completely missing out on the XBLA and PSN games.

Offline W7RE

  • Post-aholic
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,780
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #3 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 08:17:45 PM »
Buy the FFXIII Xbox bundle and trade me the 250GB drive for my 60GB. DOOO EEET!

Offline MysterD

  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 18,049
  • OWNet 4 Eternity & Beyond
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #4 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 08:46:55 PM »
No.

Offline W7RE

  • Post-aholic
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,780
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #5 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 08:50:33 PM »
Does anyone else find the pictures of D with game boxes weird?

Offline PyroMenace

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,930
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #6 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 08:52:09 PM »
I think amazing is the better word.

Offline iPPi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,159
  • Roar!
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #7 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 08:56:30 PM »
I have a friend who's like this dude as well.  He's totally against console gaming, but when asked why, he cannot provide a good reason. 

Given this generation of gaming in particular, it's become quite clear that console games are superior to PC games through and through.  There are exceptions, but they are becoming far and few between.  It's sad to see it happen since I was an avid PC gamer myself back in the day, but if you would call yourself a 'gamer' per se, you should probably follow the trend and move towards console gaming.

Offline MysterD

  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 18,049
  • OWNet 4 Eternity & Beyond
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #8 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 09:42:35 PM »
I have a friend who's like this dude as well.  He's totally against console gaming, but when asked why, he cannot provide a good reason.
It isn't that I'm against console gaming. I can't be, since I grew-up on arcades and of course the consoles. Atari 7800. Genesis. PlayStation. Yup, I got 'em. Still have 'em. Loved 'em then - and still do. Got plenty of fond memories w/ those thing - from Galaga on the Atari 7800 to Silent Hill 1 on the Playstation. Great stuff.

Quake, Duke Nukem 3D, and MechWarrior 2: Mercenaries really got me into PC gaming. That was the start of it all for me. Quake 2 was the game to get me into the MP-side of PC gaming. It's funny when I heard console gamers talk about, "It's so cool that I can play w/ someone from across the world" like it's something new - when we've be doing stuff like this on the PC since the 90's.

About this generation of console gaming - someone just tell Microsoft to fix their X360 console and lose that ridiculous failure rate. Many I've known from these message boards and other boards to people I work with have been through the RROD, over the years.

The PC has all the tools - and it should be the superior platform. But, as long as some companies don't really wanna take full advantage of it and don't see us as a place where they can make tons of sales, it's gonna be a "here and there" case - like it's been for a number of years (which is basically since the X-Box arrived). The PC - this is where the newest tech bleeds. This is where all the experimentation really can be done at, if needed. This is where all the tweaking can be done by the gamer. But, many of the triple-A gaming companies and publishers - they just don't give the PC version the treatment it used to get like back in the 1990's to early 2000's. The sales on the PC just don't jump like they do on the consoles - and as long as that's going on, they are going to support us less and less. It's going to be companies like *gasp* Valve and *cheers* Stardock (b/c they have their own platform here as a publisher, which is how they make their money) that are probably going to lead the way here - as retail is seeming to carry more and more console games and less and less PC games. Digital distribution is taking over here on the PC, as piracy is also unfortunately through the roof here. I'm just waiting for piracy to get worse and worse on the consoles - as games like Far Cry 2, Gears 2, Halo 3, and Borderlands for the 360 have been pirated heavily.

PC gaming is meant for those (like myself) who like to tweak things - who want to play w/ the game settings so that if a game is not running to our liking or it just doesn't look good enuff, we can tweak it so it will be better. This is the platform where the modding takes place. Games that were broken - i.e. Vampire: Bloodlines; Arcanum; TOEE; etc etc - they've been fixed-up like crazy and modded-up by their community. If it wasn't for the modders, we'd be stuck w/ whatever the company's last version of the game was. It keeps the lifespan of a game going even longer, once a company has either fallen or likely abandoned the game (and moved on). I doubt we'll see much of that go kind of modding go on w/ the consoles - since companies like Microsoft don't want to open the HD-up to that kind of stuff. Some of the older PC games, they've been put on modern engines or made source ports (Doomsday Engine for Doom games, anyone?) so they can look better and actually run on modern PC. Hell, some modder brought HGL over to the Torque Engine. The PC is meant to be a free-for-all like this - and that's what I love about it. There's mods out there to run Fallout 1 and 2 at higher-res's. There's been high-res textures made by some modder for System Shock 2. I can go on and on, you know...

Quote
Given this generation of gaming in particular, it's become quite clear that console games are superior to PC games through and through.  There are exceptions, but they are becoming far and few between.  It's sad to see it happen since I was an avid PC gamer myself back in the day, but if you would call yourself a 'gamer' per se, you should probably follow the trend and move towards console gaming.
Keep in mind, console games should always turn out well - since they only being made for that particular set of hardware. Consoles ain't upgradable. What you see is what you get and also what you're stuck with - which can be for better or for worse; that depends. There's no real modding there - so, don't expect Divinity 2 or Sacred 2 to get patched-up by modders on the console, if worst comes to worst. You'll really have to rely on the company to fix it and patch it up - and likely, you're going to have to join XBL (which has a yearly subscription) or PSN (which right now is good that it has no subscription plan, but might eventually have some sort of subscription plan; who knows). And well, Sacred 2 isn't getting the expansion on the consoles, anyways - due to poor console sales.

When it comes to FPS games, yes - I prefer KB/mouse over control pad. I'm sure I could play something like say Borderlands or Bioshock 2 w/ a controller and all - but I'd rather play it w/ a KB/mouse. It would be nice if for console FPS's or RTS's, there'd be some KB/mouse support there. I just can't picture playing something like say Baldur's Gate 2 or Sins of a Solar Empire w/ a X360 gamepad controller, myself.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,244
    • OW
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #9 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 09:44:56 PM »
Quote
it's become quite clear that console games are superior to PC games through and through.

I don't know about that.... but D should get a console.

Offline MysterD

  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 18,049
  • OWNet 4 Eternity & Beyond
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #10 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 09:49:44 PM »
Quote
it's become quite clear that console games are superior to PC games through and through.
I don't know about that.... but D should get a console.

I'm still waiting to see a MMO strike it big on the consoles...

EDIT:
Quote
Given this generation of gaming in particular, it's become quite clear that console games are superior to PC games through and through.  There are exceptions, but they are becoming far and few between.  It's sad to see it happen since I was an avid PC gamer myself back in the day, but if you would call yourself a 'gamer' per se, you should probably follow the trend and move towards console gaming.
I've played Left 4 Dead 1 on the 360 console - I prefer the KB/mouse controls. Compared to the PC version (given you have a modern PC and all), Left 4 Dead 1 X360 looks nowhere as good as the PC version graphically.

I think it's been reported in numerous reviews that Dragon Age PC (if you have the PC to boot) looks better than the console versions, as well. I can't really attest to that - I ain't seen DAO 360 or PS3. Plus, PC version supports the extra top-down isometric viewpoint found in games like Baldur's Gate.

Also, KOTOR and Mass Effect 1 turned out great on the PC. Usually, if a game is made for both the PC and consoles, the PC version winds up normally the better looking version - as long as you have the PC to handle it so you can turn up the resolution and graphical bells and whistles, of course. You just have to worry if the PC port wasn't lazily and quickly slapped together, that's all...

Offline idolminds

  • ZOMG!
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 11,939
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #11 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 10:04:27 PM »
But you don't play MMOs either.

Though I guess FFXI was fairly popular even on consoles. And PSO, if you want to consider that MMO.

Offline MysterD

  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 18,049
  • OWNet 4 Eternity & Beyond
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #12 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 10:07:13 PM »
But you don't play MMOs either.
I own WoW Battle Chest and Age of Conan b/c I got them damn cheap, but I just ain't gotten around to dedicating myself to a whole month of playing.

I do enjoy Guild Wars, though.

I did try Tabula Rasa, for a short time period.

Quote
Though I guess FFXI was fairly popular even on consoles. And PSO, if you want to consider that MMO.
No console MMO's were as insanely popular as Everquest and World of Warcraft - that's my point.

Offline iPPi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,159
  • Roar!
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #13 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 10:08:18 PM »
The only valid argument you make is that modding takes place on the PC platform.  Keep in mind that there are games out there that do allow people to create their own levels and to do their own thing with the game as well on consoles.  Level creators such as those in LittleBigPlanet have created a thriving community.  Also, most mods that I've seen on the PC platform take way too long to get any ground or to make any impact on the community at all.  Seriously, I remember waiting for a Max Payne mod to come out and it never did.  It's individual people who want to take the time to do something for fun.

We're not arguing which platform is superior here though.  

And the lack of mods isn't a reason to not own a console.  It seems to me that you are still blindly ignoring the question -- why do you not have a console?

Offline MysterD

  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 18,049
  • OWNet 4 Eternity & Beyond
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #14 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 10:12:45 PM »
And the lack of mods isn't a reason to not own a console.  It seems to me that you are still blindly ignoring the question -- why do you not have a console?
The majority of PC games that I actually have a major interest in, they're multi-platformed on the PC and consoles - Dragon Age, Mass Effect, FEAR series, Left 4 Dead series, Tomb Raider series, Borderlands, Divinity 2, GTA series, etc etc.

That makes my decision very easy to just stick w/ the PC.

Sure, there's a handful of console exclusives I've missed out on or are probably going to miss out - Ninja Gaiden; Heavy Rain; Fable 2; Gears of War 2; and God of War series; Uncharted series.




Offline gpw11

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7,182
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #15 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 10:20:48 PM »
If the guy doesn't want a console, I don't really see why anyone would care. Because he makes posts about news items focusing on games not going to PC?  I find it informative and helpful.

Offline iPPi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,159
  • Roar!
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #16 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 10:26:31 PM »
You just listed 14 franchises alone there in which 6 of them are console exclusives.  It seems to me that you're missing out on nearly 50% of games that you might be interested in, but refuse to spend $300 on a console and play them.  

I wouldn't really say it's only a 'handful' when you can list that many franchises that you seem to be somewhat interested in.

That's still not a really good justification, especially since you appear to blind buy games and never get around to playing them.  That money could have gone towards a console and purchases of games that you are interested in and will play.

If the guy doesn't want a console, I don't really see why anyone would care. Because he makes posts about news items focusing on games not going to PC?  I find it informative and helpful.

I agree, I could honestly care less what this guy does.  It just appears he's not a very smart consumer.  It's like a blind devotion without even considering the other options that are available on the market.

Offline W7RE

  • Post-aholic
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,780
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #17 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 10:37:58 PM »
PC is only superior as a platform for games. Once you look at the games themselves, that's when you see the difference. The PC platform is seen as secondary by a lot of devs these days.

By the way, I think L4D and DAO are the two biggest examples of games that actually DO cater to the PC platform well. If I had to list devs that have yet to abandon the PC, the first 2 off my tongue would be Blizzard and Valve. The "console first" mentality has been showing up more and more. Apparently Borderlands had some weird UI issues, MW2 was just sort of gimped compared to other PC games. Bioshock 2 apparently had gamepad controls removed so they could add kb/mouse functionality. So they based the PC version off the Xbox version? Alan Wake may not even come out on PC, Gears of War 2 never did, endless DLC comes to Xbox/PS3 long before PC sees it.


I'd be curious to know what the failure rate is for Xbox consoles bought in the last year or so. I wouldn't be surprised if the systems that are still failing are ones that are at least a few years old. It may just be luck on my part, but my 15 month old system is still doing perfectly fine, and I can't help but wonder if it's because I didn't buy one until the failure rate was remedied. I'm not saying you should rush out and buy one, but I do wonder if a lot of the Xbox hate around here is based on MS fucking people early in the system's life, and not necessarily how the current systems preform. (ie: how it would affect you if you got one)

Offline Quemaqua

  • 古い塩
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 16,498
  • パンダは触るな。
    • Bookruptcy
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #18 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 10:45:15 PM »
I know a lot of people with newer 360s and they're still failing.  I don't know what the average is on the whole, but I do know that new models aren't exempt.

天才的な閃きと平均以下のテクニックやな。 課長有野

Offline PyroMenace

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,930
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #19 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 10:46:12 PM »
Consoles ain't upgradable. What you see is what you get and also what you're stuck with - which can be for better or for worse; that depends.

What are you talking about? There are video cards which cost close to the amount of a console.

I mean sure PC are the bleeding edge of gaming tech, but what happened to the last game that really took advantage of that? And why has the PC hardware market stagnated? Because this console generation is lasting longer.

Offline Quemaqua

  • 古い塩
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 16,498
  • パンダは触るな。
    • Bookruptcy
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #20 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 10:47:24 PM »
Meh.  I like consoles as much as anything else, but the PC as a platform is still vastly superior.  Still, it's no reason to abstain if you're really into games.  There are tons of great console games that never see PC releases and wouldn't have even in past eras.  It's a whole different ballgame in some ways.

天才的な閃きと平均以下のテクニックやな。 課長有野

Offline gpw11

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7,182
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #21 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 10:59:00 PM »
You just listed 14 franchises alone there in which 6 of them are console exclusives.  It seems to me that you're missing out on nearly 50% of games that you might be interested in, but refuse to spend $300 on a console and play them.  


Devils Advocate:

The six franchises which are console exclusives are split over two consoles.  Well, three if you include the PS2 because Sony decided to go back and take features out of the PS3. Sure there probably are other games he'd play, but it is kind of a hefty investment even before actually buying the games.

What are you talking about? There are video cards which cost close to the amount of a console.

I mean sure PC are the bleeding edge of gaming tech, but what happened to the last game that really took advantage of that? And why has the PC hardware market stagnated? Because this console generation is lasting longer.

There's also videocards which can play every modern game out there for $100~$150 if you catch a sale. As for this console generation lasting longer, I wouldn't really bet on it all that much. They may say that they plan on it, but in a heavily competitive industry it doesn't make any sense to do so unless you have a high level of collusion. It's game theory. None of them can really afford to strategize on rolling the same hardware for ten years because if the other two release the next best thing the market shares refresh and they are fucked.   Collusion wouldn't be uncalled for because all three benefit if the console life lasts longer, but that takes a lot of trust in your competitors.


But really, I don't see what the deal is.  It's not like D is really against consoles...he just doesn't want one.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,244
    • OW
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #22 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 10:59:51 PM »
I am about to turn 30 this year, so I think I am too old to get into another PC vs console debate, so I am not going to even start that.

But D, like yourself, I had been avoiding consoles like the plague. I didn't like either the original Xbox or the PS2... they felt childish to me, but the Xbox 360 and the PS3 are very very PC like, aside from the modding.

I skimmed through your list of why you love PC gaming, but what does that have to do with the question? You are like a walking Bioware style codex machine or something haha..

My point is that if you don't own an Xbox 360 or a PS3, you are missing out on a ton of games that never get ported to PC. It has nothing to do with your reasoning. Buy and keep a console on the side, if you can afford it.

Like I said, I was in the same boat as you. I got a PS2 and an Xbox for my siblings and thought they were too consoly and I didn't like them. But this generation it feels much more PC like. It feels like an open experience.

In the end, GPW is right, what should we care what you do... it doesn't matter, but there are so many exclusive console titles you are missing out on.


Offline Quemaqua

  • 古い塩
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 16,498
  • パンダは触るな。
    • Bookruptcy
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #23 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 11:04:41 PM »
Ultimately, D doesn't even play half the games he buys, so he really doesn't need to spend more money on more games that he won't play.

天才的な閃きと平均以下のテクニックやな。 課長有野

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,244
    • OW
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #24 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 11:10:12 PM »
Good point... but that's good advice for so many of us.

Granted, I only started playing games again half a year ago, but I have four either barely touched, or shrink wrapped PS3 titles sitting in the wings. I also have yet to begin Fallout 3, Borderlands and two other triple A PC titles.

Quote
There's also videocards which can play every modern game out there for $100~$150 if you catch a sale.

Yea I just bought my sister a 9600GT recently and it is smoking every game out there. It cost about a hundred buckaroos so it was totally worth it.

Offline gpw11

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7,182
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #25 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 11:58:14 PM »
Yeah, I bought a 9600GT about a year ago for roughly the same price. I haven't had any problem at all running much of anything (have not tried Crysis though).

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,244
    • OW
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #26 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 12:29:55 AM »
Yea, I didn't install it on her system but had that game been a priority, I wouldn't have gotten her that card. She is more about RPGs like the Dragon Ages, the Mass Effects, the Oblivions, and strategy games like Company of Heroes and Civilization IV. All of those are running really well on her 1600x900 monitor.

It is great value for that card. I would have gotten the 4770 which is better, but she already had the Nvidia drivers on her freshly formatted system, and for some reason the 4770 is overpriced by $30 here.

Offline PyroMenace

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,930
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #27 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 12:42:34 AM »
We should start a fund to get D a console because this obviously holds some weight here. Who's in?

Offline idolminds

  • ZOMG!
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 11,939
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #28 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 01:20:29 AM »
Fuck that, buy me a Wii.

Offline Cobra951

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8,934
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #29 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 09:38:42 AM »
I'd be curious to know what the failure rate is for Xbox consoles bought in the last year or so. I wouldn't be surprised if the systems that are still failing are ones that are at least a few years old. It may just be luck on my part, but my 15 month old system is still doing perfectly fine, and I can't help but wonder if it's because I didn't buy one until the failure rate was remedied. I'm not saying you should rush out and buy one, but I do wonder if a lot of the Xbox hate around here is based on MS fucking people early in the system's life, and not necessarily how the current systems preform. (ie: how it would affect you if you got one)

My first 360 and its warranty replacement both failed.  Not exactly confidence building for someone who has never seen a console fail before (in the last 20 years).  But this new Jasper unit gives me hope they finally fixed this.  My UPS has a wattage readout.  The difference in reported wattage after turning something on tells me what it's using.  The old 360s read about 180 watts of power consumption.  The new one reads just shy of 100.  Both those numbers are in-game, not the UI.  The form factor and cooling design are the same, so it's relatively a lot more effective.

I don't know about 15-month-old machines.  Falcons should be somewhat better than the original Phoenix (defective) design.  But the real issue appears to be the GPU, which wasn't shrunk until the Jasper.  We'll see.

This thread is a lot more awesome than I expected from its title.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,244
    • OW
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #30 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 10:18:03 AM »
I should clarify that while I like my PS3 and 360, and they do feel more PC like, there is still no way in hell I'd pick a console version over the PC version. Just games like Dragon Age, Mass Effect and Mass Effect 2 look and play vastly superior on the PC. In my mind it isn't even a contest.

I just think that they are worth owning for games that are better on the consoles (like fighting or sports games), or exclusives (like Demon's Souls or Gran Turimo), or games that get ported to the PC poorly.... In the past, this wasn't the case. No exclusives in the world were worth operating a PS2 for me. It just felt -- for the lack of a better word -- mind numbing to play a PS2 game. The system just felt so ancient and prehistoric as compared to playing a game on the PC.

With the PS3, I can go online, there are frequent store and dashboard updates... I can download a lot of stuff in the background... the games are updated... there is DLC... you can upgrade the hard drive... the device allows me to watch TV shows off of my USB flashdrive... I mean it is a more PC like experience.

But as far as console gaming has come, properly developed PC multiplatform titles are always the obvious choice. People can disagree, but I know of very few people who have game capable systems who'd rather play a game like Mass Effect or Dragon Age or Fallout on their 360 rather than their PC.

Yea a lot of people would disagree, but these are the same people who haven't gamed on their PC for the past 5 years, and don't have a gaming system and a decent LCD monitor.

The only trouble is that properly developed PC ports are becoming rare. I will never buy a Ubisoft game on PC for example. I'd actually rather play Assassin's Creed 2 on my PS3/360, simply because of all the frustration that company has put me through.

Also, I'd avoid any PC title that forced G4WL on me like the genohpage.

Offline Cobra951

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8,934
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #31 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 10:46:00 AM »
But as far as console gaming has come, properly developed PC multiplatform titles are always the obvious choice. People can disagree, but I know of very few people who have game capable systems who'd rather play a game like Mass Effect or Dragon Age or Fallout on their 360 rather than their PC.

Yea a lot of people would disagree, but these are the same people who haven't gamed on their PC for the past 5 years, and don't have a gaming system and a decent LCD monitor.

For example, me.  Oh, I don't disagree.  I would rather play Fallout 3 on a kick-ass PC, with proper mouselook.  Thanks for rubbing my face in it.  :P  First it was a cost/poverty issue, and now we can add to that what iPPi and W7RE said.  PC is the superior platform; the PC games themselves by and large no longer are.  There's not enough of them (especially not enough unencumbered by deal-breaking DRM) to justify the expense for most gamers--although I assure you, if money weren't an issue, I'd still end up with one.  I'm weak that way.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,244
    • OW
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #32 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 11:36:32 AM »
Component prices have never been lower, and you can build a very good rig for about $600 or so.

Then again, you can get a 360 arcade for $199, or a PS3 for $299.

And yes, half decent ports are becoming more of a rarity. There is too much of a background check involved with buying PC games nowadays. For example, I will never buy a PC game released by Ubisoft or one that forces you to use G4WL. That still leaves a good chunk of games, but there are so many (like Assassin's Creed) that I would rather play on the console than PC, which is a shame.

Offline Quemaqua

  • 古い塩
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 16,498
  • パンダは触るな。
    • Bookruptcy
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #33 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 12:24:50 PM »
But still, there are tons of PC exclusives that are great, not to mention tons of indie titles.  It isn't as though it's hard to find good games to play on PC, even with the somewhat irritating current state of affairs.  For that reason it's nice to have the option of both a PC and a console, but I still don't think anyone *needs* more than a PC if that's what they've got, especially now that services like GoG are making older games available that one may have missed.  There's *tons* of stuff to play.  But it does seem strange to me that a hardcore gamer would actively limit himself to one realm.

天才的な閃きと平均以下のテクニックやな。 課長有野

Offline K-man

  • Post-aholic
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,967
  • HOW'S IT FEEEEEL IDOL
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #34 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 02:11:06 PM »
A main factor for me is that I'd much rather sit on my couch and play a video game than sit in my computer chair at the desk.  Those days are over for me.  I sit at a desk all day, it's the last thing I want when I get home.

Offline Quemaqua

  • 古い塩
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 16,498
  • パンダは触るな。
    • Bookruptcy
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #35 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 02:34:19 PM »
!#$& &!#$ (#@$ !@&$# !#%*#$!

天才的な閃きと平均以下のテクニックやな。 課長有野

Offline MysterD

  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 18,049
  • OWNet 4 Eternity & Beyond
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #36 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 02:40:32 PM »
But still, there are tons of PC exclusives that are great, not to mention tons of indie titles. 

Mount & Blade; Dawn of War series; upcoming ARPG from Crate (I think it was called Grim Dawn); Total War series; Egosoft's X series; STALKER series - all current PC-exclusive.

If the guy doesn't want a console, I don't really see why anyone would care. Because he makes posts about news items focusing on games not going to PC?  I find it informative and helpful.
Thanks, GPW. :) I appreciate that.

Just b/c I don't own a console, it doesn't mean I shouldn't post stuff about console games that I find interesting - especially when probably 95% of you guys around here do have consoles.

Yes, I would love to see Alan Wake and Heavy Rain come to the PC - but, eh, I don't think that'll be happening. If it does, ain't gonna be anytime soon, either.

EDIT:
What are you talking about? There are video cards which cost close to the amount of a console.

I mean sure PC are the bleeding edge of gaming tech, but what happened to the last game that really took advantage of that? And why has the PC hardware market stagnated? Because this console generation is lasting longer.
I dunno - how well did DIRT 2 PC sell, which has DX11 support?
Do the console versions of DIRT 2 don't have any sort of DX11 support and features?

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,602
    • Facebook Me
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #37 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 08:30:10 PM »
I have a three year old PC, a 360, and a Wii.  The latter two are dust-collectors.  I'm not anti console.  I just don't like console games.  Third party action, JRPG, and racing games just aren't my thing.  I much prefer FPS games, which are 1000x better on PC.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,244
    • OW
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #38 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 09:09:08 PM »
A main factor for me is that I'd much rather sit on my couch and play a video game than sit in my computer chair at the desk.  Those days are over for me.  I sit at a desk all day, it's the last thing I want when I get home.

Unless it is a shooter, RPG or an RTS, I'd have to agree. I am not sure why it drives Que mad though haha. :P

What is wrong with gaming on a couch Que?

Offline W7RE

  • Post-aholic
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,780
Re: Dear MysterD
« Reply #39 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 09:13:38 PM »
I play FPS on my Xbox.

I pretty much just play WoW on my PC.