It's all over the place.
The Gamespot review was particularly polarizing because the score doesn't match with the reviewer's comments.
The main negatives seem to boil down to:
1. Bugs, bugs, bugs
2. Strange animations
3. Boring, long-winded start to the adventure
4. Uninteresting party members
5. Inconsistent plot that scatters the story all over the place
I'm betting it's an undoubtedly good game but not a great one.
Yep, Cobra - that's my bet and hope now: it's good, but not great.
But, I still can't help but be disappointed here b/c one of my main reason to play any BioWare-branded game is dealing w/ interesting characters w/ great personal stories, writing, + dialogue. In most instances, that stuff often made-up for the janky combat and/or not-so-spectacular main stories that often come w/ BioWare's games. Even DA2 didn't let me down, with its cast of characters.
Somehow, I think this time around with ME:A that PC Gamer might have the most realistic + fair review here.
And it sounds like this ME:A review is also the one they probably should've given to DA2, also.
I still think DA2 is underrated as hell, since every piled on it and said ti was terrible - yet, it was far from that, IMHO. I just think DA2 ain't the masterpiece that both DAO + DAI were.
I'd guess ME:A is not the greatness that ME1; ME2 (especially ME2); and also ME3 are.